| This overview will compare two
different development patterns—traditional
and sprawl. Both patterns are thoroughly planned.
Both spend a lot of time thinking about the location
and placement of elements, and both are marketable.
The excuse that traditional development is not marketable
is no longer valid. Traditional developments are
marketable. Both development patterns provide for
daily activities. Sprawl and traditional developments
are not two different planning theories but two
choices. Both claim they have centers, defined edges,
walkability, open space, civic buildings, and proper
building placement. Both claim they address the
need for schools and parking. The issue is not whether
or not a pattern provides these things. The issue
is which development pattern is healthy and sustainable.
Sprawl is not healthy or sustainable, and each of
these elements is clearly defined.
|
